Congressional Challengers
-10%
portes grátis
Congressional Challengers
Candidate Quality in U.S. Elections to Congress
Panagopoulos, Costas
Taylor & Francis Ltd
12/2021
134
Dura
Inglês
9781138057876
15 a 20 dias
430
Descrição não disponível.
Dedication and Acknowledgments
List of Figures
List of Tables
1 Dynamics of Challenger Quality: Introduction
2 Challenger Quality-Conceptualization and Measurement
3 Explaining Challenger Quality: Hypotheses and Methodology
4 Money and Challenger Quality
5 Candidate Quality and Campaign Communications Strategies
6 Movin' On Up: The Impact of State Legislative Term Limits on Candidate Quality in U.S. House Elections, 1972-2018
7 States of Ambition: Aggregate Challenger Quality in the U.S. States, 1972-2018
8 Explaining the Decline in Challenger Quality, 1972-2018
9 Implications: Challenger Quality, Incumbency Advantage, and Democracy in America
10 Conclusion
References
Appendix
List of Figures
List of Tables
1 Dynamics of Challenger Quality: Introduction
2 Challenger Quality-Conceptualization and Measurement
3 Explaining Challenger Quality: Hypotheses and Methodology
4 Money and Challenger Quality
5 Candidate Quality and Campaign Communications Strategies
6 Movin' On Up: The Impact of State Legislative Term Limits on Candidate Quality in U.S. House Elections, 1972-2018
7 States of Ambition: Aggregate Challenger Quality in the U.S. States, 1972-2018
8 Explaining the Decline in Challenger Quality, 1972-2018
9 Implications: Challenger Quality, Incumbency Advantage, and Democracy in America
10 Conclusion
References
Appendix
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
High Quality Challengers;Candidate quality;Challenger Quality;American democracy;State Legislative Professionalism;Incumbents;Incumbency Advantage;Campaign finance;Open Seat Races;High Quality Candidates;Campaign reform;Experienced Challengers;Congressional elections;Inexperienced Challengers;Term limits;Rising Campaign Costs;Incumbent Spending;Open Seat;Term Limited States;Challenger Spending;Senate Challenger;Dakota;Follow;Campaign Communications Strategies;OLS Regression;Low Quality Candidates;Incumbent Reelection Rates;Simple OLS Regression;Ad Airings;Aggregate Proportion
Dedication and Acknowledgments
List of Figures
List of Tables
1 Dynamics of Challenger Quality: Introduction
2 Challenger Quality-Conceptualization and Measurement
3 Explaining Challenger Quality: Hypotheses and Methodology
4 Money and Challenger Quality
5 Candidate Quality and Campaign Communications Strategies
6 Movin' On Up: The Impact of State Legislative Term Limits on Candidate Quality in U.S. House Elections, 1972-2018
7 States of Ambition: Aggregate Challenger Quality in the U.S. States, 1972-2018
8 Explaining the Decline in Challenger Quality, 1972-2018
9 Implications: Challenger Quality, Incumbency Advantage, and Democracy in America
10 Conclusion
References
Appendix
List of Figures
List of Tables
1 Dynamics of Challenger Quality: Introduction
2 Challenger Quality-Conceptualization and Measurement
3 Explaining Challenger Quality: Hypotheses and Methodology
4 Money and Challenger Quality
5 Candidate Quality and Campaign Communications Strategies
6 Movin' On Up: The Impact of State Legislative Term Limits on Candidate Quality in U.S. House Elections, 1972-2018
7 States of Ambition: Aggregate Challenger Quality in the U.S. States, 1972-2018
8 Explaining the Decline in Challenger Quality, 1972-2018
9 Implications: Challenger Quality, Incumbency Advantage, and Democracy in America
10 Conclusion
References
Appendix
Este título pertence ao(s) assunto(s) indicados(s). Para ver outros títulos clique no assunto desejado.
High Quality Challengers;Candidate quality;Challenger Quality;American democracy;State Legislative Professionalism;Incumbents;Incumbency Advantage;Campaign finance;Open Seat Races;High Quality Candidates;Campaign reform;Experienced Challengers;Congressional elections;Inexperienced Challengers;Term limits;Rising Campaign Costs;Incumbent Spending;Open Seat;Term Limited States;Challenger Spending;Senate Challenger;Dakota;Follow;Campaign Communications Strategies;OLS Regression;Low Quality Candidates;Incumbent Reelection Rates;Simple OLS Regression;Ad Airings;Aggregate Proportion